| Author | Presentation Of The Result Of Our Research On The Yard And Megalithic Inch. |
JSeimple
Joined:
12-03-2019
Messages: 10
 OFF-Line
|  Posted 16-03-2019 at 16:22
Greetings,
A few years ago, one of your members had created a post that talked about my work and that allowed me to discover a forum rich in content. I remembered it and that's the reason of my post.
My name is Jean Seimple, I am among others, the author with Fabien Pardo, of the book «Pyramid Apocalypsia», which deals with the great pyramid of Giza and the message it contains.
We are absolutely not specialists in the yard and the Megalithic inch, but our research led us to cross these two ancients units of measurement.
Wednesday, March 20, 2019, at 21:58 GMT, will be posted our new video: EQUINOXE.
Broadcast in 4 parts, the part 4, present the results of our research on the yard and Megalithic inch and reveal for the first time, the origin and the incredible message they transmit. Just be aware that in order to read the message, it was necessary to take its metric value, because the message had to be universal, and that the meter, a simple proportion of the earth, is a the standard common to humanity.
The first part, will deal with the shadow and light phenomenon of the Great Pyramid at the equinoxes. Thanks to a computer reconstitution, we will, for the first time and in a certain way, see in live the equinox of March 21, 2019 in Giza, from sunrise to sunset.
(©Pyramid Apocalypsia, Equinoxe 1.)
Part 2, will give the reason and the scientific explanation of alignments around a 30° inclined circle of important archaeological sites, according to the work of Jim Alison, published on Graham Hancock's blog in 2001, and show you that his theory was accurate.
Part 3, will be devoted to the message conveyed by Great Pyramid of Cheops, which explains that the continent Antarctica is the famous continent Atlantis and this time it is Charles Hapgood who was right. Will be released for the first time, unpublished images of Antarctica without its ice.
(©Pyramide Apocalypsia, Equinoxe 3.)
(Albert Einstein on the work of Charles hapgood, Saturday evening post, january 10, 1959 p67)
Be aware that this video, which we do not monetize, took us a lot of work and that the simple translation and time code subtitles, is almost two days of work, so imagine the rest...
We simply want to give back to our children, their history and allow us to have a thought for our ancestors, victims of this great catastrophe, today called, the Flood...
You can set a reminder with these links.
Equinoxe 1 : https://youtu.be/yWAq7OoiGMg
Equinoxe 2 : https://youtu.be/uhKvs_2_2Hk
Equinoxe 3 : https://youtu.be/-t1pzGUxqO8
Equinoxe 4 : https://youtu.be/AVYJmwOPjGI
Warmly,
Jean Seimple.
Website : https://www.poureuxlelivre.fr/welcome
[ This message was edited by: JSeimple on 2019-03-17 03:17 ]
[ This message was edited by: JSeimple on 2019-03-17 03:21 ]
[ This message was edited by: davidmorgan on 2019-03-17 18:48 ]
[ This message was edited by: JSeimple on 2019-03-19 23:19 ]
 Profile
 Reply
|
Runemage
Joined:
15-07-2005
Messages: 3926
from UK
OFF-Line
| Posted 16-03-2019 at 20:58
Hello Jean and welcome.
That's so good of you to remember us from so long ago.
Thank-you for posting the details of the videos, I and I'm sure many other people will be watching with great interest.
The link to your website in your post is not working for me, I get an error mesage., let me try a separate link now
https://www.poureuxlelivre.fr/welcome/
Just checked, yes, that looks good to me.
Looking forward to watching your videos,
Rune
[ This message was edited by: Runemage on 2019-03-16 21:00 ]
Profile
Reply
|
JSeimple
Joined:
12-03-2019
Messages: 10
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-03-2019 at 03:25
Hello runemage and thank you for your welcome.
I have not managed to correct the link, so thank you for putting it.
Sincerely.
Profile
Reply
|
Orpbit
Joined:
24-06-2012
Messages: 1568
from Shropshire
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-03-2019 at 15:59
For me the links to the respective youtube videos are hijacked to the "Home Improvements" site - now becoming quite a regular occurrence for some reason!
I've de-bugged them so I'm posting them to see what happens when I click on them - I'll post an edit if they work successfully:
Part 1:
https://youtu.be/yWAq7OoiGMg
Part 2:
https://youtu.be/uhKvs_2_2Hk
Part 3:
https://youtu.be/-t1pzGUxqO8;
Part 4:
https://youtu.be/AVYJmwOPjGI;
Home Page:
https://www.poureuxlelivre.fr/equinoxe/
Edit:
Well, my links work directly but the OP's original links no longer redirect to the "Home Iprovements" site but a message stating that the server can't be found appears instead!.
Has anyone else had this problem on their PC?
[ This message was edited by: Orpbit on 2019-03-17 16:04 ]
[ This message was edited by: Orpbit on 2019-03-21 09:44 ]
Profile
Reply
|
Runemage
Joined:
15-07-2005
Messages: 3926
from UK
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-03-2019 at 17:21
I'm just getting a 'This Site Can't be Reached' from every link in Jean's post to the youtube videos, but the ones in your post work fine, thanks Orpbit.
Rune
Profile
Reply
|
davidmorgan
Joined:
23-11-2006
Messages: 3090
from UK
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-03-2019 at 18:51
There's a problem with BBCode URLs, missing a colon. Fixed here now.
Profile
Reply
|
JSeimple
Joined:
12-03-2019
Messages: 10
OFF-Line
| Posted 19-03-2019 at 23:21
Greetings,
The url of the video Equinox 1, has changed. the time and date are the same as well as for the video URLs 2,3 and 4.
Equinoxe 1 : https://youtu.be/yWAq7OoiGMg
March 20, 2019, 22:00 GMT
Sincerely.
Profile
Reply
|
Orpbit
Joined:
24-06-2012
Messages: 1568
from Shropshire
OFF-Line
| Posted 20-03-2019 at 20:11
These are the circumstances for equinox at Ghiza. As the actual time of the equinox is 21.58 UT, and the closest to exact rise at 90° east, is the closest to this time then rise on 21 March is the one to observe. As a matter of interest, since the Moon will also be at all but full, I've included the details for it too:
Sunset 20 March:
Moonrise, 20 March:
Sunrise, 21 March:
Moonset, 21 March:
The local horizon was generated from "heywhatsthat" website. I haven't yet generated one from SRTM 30 metre data, using Horizon software.
Profile
Reply
|
Orpbit
Joined:
24-06-2012
Messages: 1568
from Shropshire
OFF-Line
| Posted 21-03-2019 at 10:19
Reasonably short videos but need to watch for much longer due to subtitles often "flashing" by at great speed.
Initial comment is that there is a range of thought provoking issues from astronomy through to conspiracy theory, all of which reflects the very issues which I've been tackling ever since I first started my journey on the road of archaeoastronomy!
A fair bit of selective mathematics to fit a theory, but entirely legitimate bearing in mind the spectrum of measurements found by various surveyors, much like the range of dimensions to be found - and argued about - at Stonehenge.
I can come back another time to argue some of these, but I haven't got the time at the moment since, indeed, Stonehenge is a priority.
Nevertheless, the oblique aerial view in Part 1 was interesting so I've superimposed it on my firsr image:
There does appear to be a big hole in the presentation in that it does not pursue the issue of Orion and the belt stars from a more detailed point of view, concentrating as it does on the Great Pyramid almost entirely and its link to revealing Atlantis.
The current viewing statistics from Part 1 to Part 4 respectively are:
990
500
471
423
I guess that as time progresses these will even out more. Some people may "drop out" due to the language/subtitle issues, and the geometry and maths which is frequently a "put off" to many.
[ This message was edited by: Orpbit on 2019-03-21 10:21 ]
Profile
Reply
|
Runemage
Joined:
15-07-2005
Messages: 3926
from UK
OFF-Line
| Posted 21-03-2019 at 16:24
It seems like a new interpretation to me Jean.
Beautifully presented and easy to understand, a very interesting concept.
Thank-you
Rune
Profile
Reply
|
JSeimple
Joined:
12-03-2019
Messages: 10
OFF-Line
| Posted 21-03-2019 at 16:27
I did what I had to do, those who want to deepen, here is the page for references and calculations : paper
In any case I thank you Runemage for your welcome.
Warmly,
J.S.
[ This message was edited by: JSeimple on 2019-03-28 01:29 ]
Profile
Reply
|
Orpbit
Joined:
24-06-2012
Messages: 1568
from Shropshire
OFF-Line
| Posted 21-03-2019 at 18:53
Hi Jean,
I had a quick look at your technical details:
The centre of any square or rectangle can be found by drawing the diagonals from each corner at the best estimated ground points. If this is awkward due to the quality of the imagery, you can estimate two or three and find the average. For GP the coordinates I use are as follows:
Glen Dash's coordinates are 31.13418244N, 29.97916678E.
For your information, the acceleration due to gravity (little g) at the GP is 979.323 cm/s². Note the close match to the decimal fraction at this location. Whether it is intentional or not I don't know, although, as I have undertaken quite a bit of research regarding pendulums, I lean strongly towards deliberate.
Why? Because if you divide this value by the 360° of a circle you get 2.720342, which for all practical purposes is Alexander Thom's Megalithic Yard.
I have other observations but will leave those for another time.
[ This message was edited by: Orpbit on 2019-03-21 19:05 ]
Profile
Reply
|
JSeimple
Joined:
12-03-2019
Messages: 10
OFF-Line
| Posted 21-03-2019 at 19:36
Hi Orpbit, you made a very interesting observation...
Quote:
| Note the close match to the decimal fraction at this location. Whether it is intentional or not I don't know, |
|
Look absolutely this video and you will understand why.
Pyramide : https://youtu.be/XGy-SyW4VVM
[ This message was edited by: JSeimple on 2019-03-22 00:18 ]
Profile
Reply
|
Orpbit
Joined:
24-06-2012
Messages: 1568
from Shropshire
OFF-Line
| Posted 22-03-2019 at 13:35
Hello Jean,
Thankyou for the link.
I should point out that the observation referred to was actually made many years ago. At that time I suppose - I can't remember! - I could have pursued G but decided to pursue little g, although of course one can't help keeping up to date either way. I have, therefore, also downloaded your paper of October 2018 at academia(dot)edu:
https://www.academia.edu/37214381/Proposition_Of_The_Fundamental_Formula_Of_The_Constant_G
In the context of your wish to have it further progressed scientifically, I would point you to the following paper by Virginia Trimble/Katalyn Horstman, which is a history concerning G upto 2016, and it may be useful for you to contact the authors in terms of initiating a scientific scrutiny of your paper:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.10556
However, there is, if I am correct, some not so good news in respect of your Equinoxe 2 video, particularly if you wish to actively promote it, and indeed all the videos, within academic circles.
If we start at approximately 4min 45sec, I'm afraid your reference to Newton's Proposition XX, Problem IV in his Principia is incorrect in terms of flattening of the Earth. You should be referring to Proposition XIX, Problem III:
https://tinyurl.com/yy7eldur
Here he states the ratio 288 to 289, and the actual flattening, currently, is 0.003352811 (WGS 84), not the figure of 0.00434782 which you quote, and which relates to the ratio of 230 to 229.
The correct value returns an answer of 1195.266 m, not 921.72 m as stated.
This is a useful explanation for the general reader:
https://gisgeography.com/ellipsoid-oblate-spheroid-earth/
The section following relating to the Form factor J2 is correct, except that the value is 923.67, not 923.95 as stated - looks like an error on the part of the video producer.
A more technical paper can be downloaded here:
https://tinyurl.com/y6ns7a8v
Unfortunately, it is these sorts of errors which critics of "alternative" thinkers/researchers - labelled as pseudoscientists or conspiracy theorists - pick up on very quickly:
http://atlantipedia.ie/samples/seimple-jean-n/
http://atlantipedia.ie/samples/pardo-fabien/
So you have to keep a sense of humour such as at this site
https://uhxnue.wordpress.com/2016/12/16/atlantide-le-secret-est-tombe/
where the scrolling ad at top displayed the following when I visited it!
If it had been £756.56 it would have neatly connected GP with Stonehenge as in my response to Hewpop at
https://www.megalithic.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=Forum&file=viewtopic&topic=4806&forum=4&start=360
Nevertheless 52 has its own intriguing "secrets"!
[ This message was edited by: Orpbit on 2019-03-22 13:37 ]
Profile
Reply
|
JSeimple
Joined:
12-03-2019
Messages: 10
OFF-Line
| Posted 22-03-2019 at 17:18
Hi,
Newton's rate is the one measured by the satellites in orbit and as we explain in the video 2, the flattening rate measured physically is an anomaly and does not correspond to what we should get with the laws of gravitation, the same anomaly that we have with the plane of the ecliptic. Read this article, everything is explained.
https://www.poureuxlelivre.fr/a-great-day-for-humanity/
Profile
Reply
|
Orpbit
Joined:
24-06-2012
Messages: 1568
from Shropshire
OFF-Line
| Posted 22-03-2019 at 23:57
Hi again Jean,
Thankyou for the link. In the meantime I had a chance to check Principia in more detail and although I am correct with respect to Proposition XIX, Problem III, I noted that the ratio of 1/230 is to be found at the very bottom of page 407. I have my own electronic copy, but it's been many years since I've looked at it in any detail and the diagram in your video with the 230:229 ratio alongside it, erroneously led me to more or less stop at the 288:289 ratio.
OK, that clarified, I note that your link leads to quite a lengthy presentation, so I'll have to set some time aside to give it more focused attention.
Equinoxe 3:
My initial observation with respect to Equinoxe 3, is that you immediately state a 26.18 angle, with reference to Phi. This is something that I have looked into over many years and I do not agree with John Logan's theoretical determinations. Also, he calculates different angles for ascending and descending passages, but you appear to choose the one which fits your theory - that's fine with me but only if you can give a convincing argument for you stating "...omnipresent angle of 26.18°...".
The evidence from the spectrum of determinations, points to values very close to or at 26.56 (90 - arctan2), which is the value that I work to. These two - quite long - videos are immensely interesting, and show quite independently of all the other determinations a very convincing argument for the 26.56 value.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIZYoUzWNDU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6aIQPBgTD8
At 17:30 in the second you will find the appropriate dimensional results.
Wikipaedia quotes:
"...there is a Descending Passage 0.96 metres (3.1 ft) high and 1.04 metres (3.4 ft) wide, which goes down at an angle of 26° 31'23"..." and "...The Ascending Passage is 39.3 metres (129 ft) long, as wide and high as the Descending Passage and slopes up at almost precisely the same angle to reach the Grand Gallery...".
It may be that you have answered this somewhere also, and I would be grateful for the link to it if you have one?
Profile
Reply
|
Orpbit
Joined:
24-06-2012
Messages: 1568
from Shropshire
OFF-Line
| Posted 23-03-2019 at 13:44
Jean, perhaps this will interest you. I have previously posted items regarding Hayley's Comet and dating at Loughcrew:
The above image was prepared in the context of the Sweatman/Tsikritsis paper on decoding the "Vulture Stone" at Gobekli Tepe as a"Date Stamp" for the Younger Dryas event. I believe the "Fox" represents Hayley's Comet...but that's all another story!
However, I have also been interested in interpreting spirals in rock art as possibly representing "rhumb lines":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhumb_line
The connection is obviously in terms of knowledge of the dimensions of the Earth, astronomy and navigation among potentially other things. I have now seen your Equinoxe 3, which inspired me to have a go at interpreting an orthostat in Newgrange in the context of Earth shifts:
Alternatively the top two spirals may represent the northern and southern hemispheres and the angle the shift, reflecting the "V" as above the GP entrance.
https://www.mythicalireland.com/ancient-sites/101-facts-about-newgrange/
Obviously, this now presents options in terms of interpreting the zig-zag lines either as precession - "sea of time" - or the "deluge"!
[ This message was edited by: Orpbit on 2019-03-23 13:57 ]
Profile
Reply
|
JSeimple
Joined:
12-03-2019
Messages: 10
OFF-Line
| Posted 23-03-2019 at 16:15
Hi,
Petrie measured an angle very close to 26.18° , we measured on one of the most accurate plan of the GP, angles of 26.18°, and a group of researchers measured angles very close to 26.18 ° (this is in French, but I can give you the link if you want).
In the link I gave you, we are talking about Gobleki T., what we discovered is that there was a gap between the arrival of a star and the displacement of the earth's crust. (200 years). The star arrived in -8900 BC.
the streaks make me think of a succession of waves, for the spirals, there is clearly the will to transmit information. the drawing being very simplistic, they are the most difficult to decode. I'm going to watch this quietly, because there are some very interesting informations.
[ This message was edited by: JSeimple on 2019-03-23 18:36 ]
Profile
Reply
|
JSeimple
Joined:
12-03-2019
Messages: 10
OFF-Line
| Posted 23-03-2019 at 18:38
Here is what I understand of these engravings.
There is no mathematical relationship, it is just a message that says that the star that indicates the north (the celestial pole) has changed and therefore, a change of inclination of the axis of the earth.
Profile
Reply
|
Orpbit
Joined:
24-06-2012
Messages: 1568
from Shropshire
OFF-Line
| Posted 23-03-2019 at 18:53
Hi again Jean,
The drawing may appear simplistic but the carving must have been a massive effort and therefore of significant importance!
I have had quite a lot of dialogue on the Gobekli Tepe site. In summary, although one or two contributors have reasonably open minds, the predominant response is "pseudoarchaeology" and even in one case, that anyone trying to interpret astronomically is "...delusional..."!
As regards 26.16°, yes please post the research link. As to plans, there is no such thing as the "most accurate" because all depends on who drew it and to whose measurements. Nevertheless, after some time researching I remain in the 26.56° camp until I'm convinced otherwise. However, I should point out that this does not detract from the Phi hypothesis. I have posted diagrams of relevant information on other threads, which I will find and post here. I think they will speak for themselves.
After this I will need to stop for the time being as I have important other priorities, but perhaps there will be enough here to encourage other readers to contribute
In the meantime I had found other interesting information which I post below.
Mythical Ireland blog re Ireland's "Stonehenge" - the Ballynahattin Carnbeg stone circle:
https://blog.mythicalireland.com/2015/12/fabulous-new-3d-images-by-kerem-gogus.html
Ireland's "Stonehenge"_Dreamstime image:
This is the article link - it is in image format, and too big for showing here:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-NQEIPSSU15U/Vmb5JVhOw9I/AAAAAAAAWX4/JgmMBf80idA/s1600/Irelands-Stonehenge.jpg
World Heritage Ireland site, with "lozenge" (or "Earth"?) image:
http://www.worldheritageireland.ie/bru-na-boinne/built-heritage/art/
Tracy Cronin_interesting notes with a range of art work:
http://tracycroninleavingcertart.blogspot.com/p/pre-christian-ireland-stone-age-and.html
Yes, all offering no proof of anything, but better to find interesting examples to muse over, than to find nothing.
Edit:
One much larger image than I thought, but I'll leave it to the Mods to decide what to do with it. I think David Morgan said that the site would automatically reduce image size to fit pages, but I don't know when this will be implemented.
[ This message was edited by: Orpbit on 2019-03-23 18:56 ]
Profile
Reply
|
|
